Same-subcategory comparison

Teamwork.comvsWrike

Compare buyer fit, pricing, capability depth, and purchase constraints within one buying category. A higher score is not a universal winner.

Comparison summary

How to choose

These conclusions apply to this subcategory and the buyer conditions shown here. They do not make one product universally better.

Teamwork.com

Consider when
  • Agencies, consultancies, and professional-services teams
  • Client-delivery organizations tracking utilization and billable time
Check before choosing
  • Teams needing only lightweight internal task management
  • Organizations that do not track client work, time, utilization, budgets, or profitability
Full profile

Wrike

Consider when
  • Mid-sized and enterprise cross-functional teams
  • PMOs coordinating projects, portfolios, capacity, and reporting
Check before choosing
  • Very small teams that need only lightweight task management
  • Buyers requiring every advanced feature in a low-cost entry plan
Full profile
DimensionTeamwork.comWrike
Pricing and trial
  • Free
    • $0 USD · per user · per month · Teamwork.com Free · Maximum five users and five projects
  • Basics
    • $9.99 USD · per user · per month · Basics annual subscription · annual upfront payment · one-year commitment · minimum 3 user · Annual subscription; minimum three users
  • Accelerate
    • $24.99 USD · per user · per month · Accelerate annual subscription · annual upfront payment · one-year commitment · minimum 5 user · Annual subscription; minimum five users
  • Optimize
    • Requires quote · Optimize custom quote · custom quote · Book a demo for pricing
  • Enterprise
    • Requires quote · Enterprise custom quote · custom quote · Book a demo for pricing

Teamwork.com lists Free at USD 0, Basics at USD 9.99 per user per month billed yearly, and Accelerate at USD 24.99 per user per month billed yearly. Optimize and Enterprise require a quote. Annual subscriptions are prepaid for the full annual term; monthly subscriptions have no long-term commitment, but the current monthly amounts were not retained because the opened public state did not display them.

Full profile
  • Free
    • $0 USD · per user · per month · Wrike Free · No credit card required
  • Team
    • $10 USD · per user · per month · Team displayed annual-billing rate · billed annually · New purchases on or after January 21, 2026
  • Business
    • $25 USD · per user · per month · Business displayed annual-billing rate · billed annually · New purchases on or after January 21, 2026
  • Pinnacle
    • Requires quote · Pinnacle custom quote · custom quote · Contact Wrike for pricing
  • Apex
    • Requires quote · Apex custom quote · custom quote · Contact Wrike for pricing

Wrike lists Free at USD 0, Team at USD 10 per user per month, and Business at USD 25 per user per month. Displayed paid amounts are billed annually per user. Pinnacle and Apex require a quote. Wrike also publishes seat-group purchasing rules and states that Business and higher are annual subscriptions.

Full profile
Best for
  • Agencies, consultancies, and professional-services teams
  • Client-delivery organizations tracking utilization and billable time
  • Teams managing project budgets, costs, revenue, and profitability
  • Mid-sized and enterprise cross-functional teams
  • PMOs coordinating projects, portfolios, capacity, and reporting
  • Organizations needing configurable workflows and enterprise governance
Not for
  • Teams needing only lightweight internal task management
  • Organizations that do not track client work, time, utilization, budgets, or profitability
  • Buyers requiring the deepest financial and resource features at a public self-service price
  • Very small teams that need only lightweight task management
  • Buyers requiring every advanced feature in a low-cost entry plan
  • Organizations unwilling to manage annual billing, seat-group purchasing, or sales-assisted upper tiers
Source check98/10097/100
Key features
  • Task lists, boards, tables, Gantt charts, milestones, dependencies, projects, workflows, and portfolios
  • Workload planning, live capacity, tentative work, roles, skills, and utilization
  • Billable and non-billable time, timesheets, budgets, retainers, costs, invoices, and profitability
  • Critical-path identification and planned-versus-actual reporting
  • Conditional multi-action automations with usage limits by plan
  • Tasks, boards, tables, dashboards, interactive Gantt charts, projects, and portfolios
  • Dependencies, critical path, and current or historical Gantt snapshots
  • Workload charts, effort, capacity, job roles, staffing, and utilization
  • Time tracking, billable hours, budgets, cost rates, and financial planning
  • No-code automation plus optional or included cross-application recipes
Cons
  • Skills planning, tentative work, multi-currency budgets, and advanced profitability insights require Optimize or higher.
  • Entry paid prices are annual-subscription rates and plan minimums raise the actual starting account cost.
  • AI credits are scheduled to become usage-based in September 2026, but future rates are not yet established in the captured public page.
  • Advanced resource planning, budgeting, BI, integrations, and governance require upper tiers or add-ons.
  • Published per-user rates are subject to annual billing and seat-group purchasing rules.
  • Pinnacle, Apex, add-ons, deployment services, and larger purchases require sales contact.
Category buying score
79Joint highest score
79Joint highest score
Rank#3#4
ContextProject & Portfolio Management / Project Management SoftwareProject & Portfolio Management / Project Management Software
Planning and work execution
87Combined planning structures, dependencies, workflows, time logging, budgets, and planned-versus-actual tracking support end-to-end client project delivery, provided buyers select the plan that matches needed budget and capacity depth.
87Wrike combines projects, tasks, boards, tables, Gantt charts, dependencies, and critical path, which supports planning through execution in one system, with advanced workflow and resource controls moving to higher tiers.
Collaboration and adoption
82A permanent Free plan for up to five users and five projects plus permission-limited client users lowers the barrier for small client-delivery teams to start shared project work without exposing internal financial data.
77A permanent Free plan, 14-day trial without a credit card, desktop/web/mobile access patterns, and controlled external users lower initial access barriers, while paid collaboration depth and admin controls still scale with edition.
Portfolio and program visibility
81Portfolios and portfolio-level reporting give multi-project visibility for services organizations, though Free’s five-project ceiling and higher-plan financial insight boundaries limit how far portfolio economics extend without upgrade.
84Portfolios, dashboards, reporting, and forecasting are supported, so PMO-style visibility is strong enough for multi-project oversight, although the exact depth of portfolio governance is greater in upper tiers.
Resource, capacity, and schedule management
75Live capacity and workload planning on Accelerate address day-to-day resource load, while utilization plus Optimize-only tentative work and skills or role scheduling define the ceiling for deeper capacity management.
74Resource workload charts are unavailable on lower tiers, and advanced capabilities like job-role planning, staffing, and capacity tracking require Pinnacle or Apex.
Automation and integrations
71Conditional multi-action automations can reduce repetitive project setup within plan usage limits, but integration breadth beyond connected Teamwork products and separate BI connectivity is not established as a fully detailed self-serve catalog in the supplied commercial record.
76Wrike provides no-code automation and optional or included cross-application recipes, with included Integrate and Sync capabilities only in Apex, so automation breadth depends materially on the selected plan or add-on.
Reporting, controls, and governance
79Project permissions and financial-data controls safeguard sensitive client work, though advanced access policies and SSO require moving up to the Enterprise plan.
80Enterprise security, auditability, and custom roles are supported on high tiers, whereas lower plans lack robust governance controls.
Usability, support, and total cost
69Entry paid prices require a prepaid annual commitment and mandatory seat minimums, while onboarding, premium support, and connected products may add extra costs.
67Free access and listed Team and Business annual-billing rates aid entry evaluation, but seat-group purchasing, Business-and-higher annual subscriptions, quote-based Pinnacle and Apex, and paid add-ons make total cost and packaging dependent on sales-assisted configuration.
Full profileFull profileFull profile

Comparison summary

Most material score differences

These are the stored dimension rationales returned with each score. They explain the buyer conditions behind the gap without speculating about hidden model reasoning.

Collaboration and adoption

5 pts
Teamwork.com · 82/100
A permanent Free plan for up to five users and five projects plus permission-limited client users lowers the barrier for small client-delivery teams to start shared project work without exposing internal financial data.
Wrike · 77/100
A permanent Free plan, 14-day trial without a credit card, desktop/web/mobile access patterns, and controlled external users lower initial access barriers, while paid collaboration depth and admin controls still scale with edition.

Automation and integrations

5 pts
Teamwork.com · 71/100
Conditional multi-action automations can reduce repetitive project setup within plan usage limits, but integration breadth beyond connected Teamwork products and separate BI connectivity is not established as a fully detailed self-serve catalog in the supplied commercial record.
Wrike · 76/100
Wrike provides no-code automation and optional or included cross-application recipes, with included Integrate and Sync capabilities only in Apex, so automation breadth depends materially on the selected plan or add-on.

Portfolio and program visibility

3 pts
Teamwork.com · 81/100
Portfolios and portfolio-level reporting give multi-project visibility for services organizations, though Free’s five-project ceiling and higher-plan financial insight boundaries limit how far portfolio economics extend without upgrade.
Wrike · 84/100
Portfolios, dashboards, reporting, and forecasting are supported, so PMO-style visibility is strong enough for multi-project oversight, although the exact depth of portfolio governance is greater in upper tiers.

Research basis

Research basis

This page uses stored product facts, official evidence, and category scoring rationales. It is not an account-based hands-on test, and third-party user ratings are not folded into the category buying score.

Teamwork.com
Fact confidence: 98% · Fact checked: 2026-08-10
Wrike
Fact confidence: 97% · Fact checked: 2026-08-10

More tools

Project Management Software

Add more tools from the same subcategory to this comparison. The page keeps up to 6 tools.

#1

Adobe Workfront

Adobe Workfront is enterprise work management software for planning, resourcing, executing, governing, reviewing, and reporting project and marketing work.

83
#2

ClickUp

ClickUp is a work management platform for planning projects, coordinating tasks, tracking time and capacity, automating workflows, and reporting across teams.

81
#3

Teamwork.com

Teamwork.com is a project and professional-services management platform for delivering client work, planning resources, tracking time and budgets, and measuring profitability.

79Compared
#4

Wrike

Wrike is a work management platform for planning projects, coordinating resources, automating workflows, and reporting across teams and portfolios.

79Compared
#5

Asana

Asana is a work management platform for planning projects, coordinating tasks and workflows, managing portfolios and resources, and reporting on cross-functional execution.

78
#6

Smartsheet

Smartsheet is a work management platform for planning projects, coordinating programs and portfolios, automating processes, managing resources, and reporting across organizations.

78
#7

monday work management

monday work management is a configurable work management product for planning projects, coordinating tasks and processes, allocating resources, managing portfolios, and reporting across teams.

77
#8

Zoho Projects

Zoho Projects is online project management software for planning tasks and schedules, tracking time and budgets, managing resources, automating workflows, and collaborating with clients.

74
#9

ProofHub

ProofHub is project management and team collaboration software for organizing tasks, schedules, time, files, discussions, proofing, reports, and client work.

68
#10

Basecamp

Basecamp is project management and team collaboration software that organizes tasks, schedules, discussions, files, reporting, and client work in shared projects.

64

More comparisons

More same-subcategory comparisons for Teamwork.com

Compare the first tool against top-ranked and nearby tools in the same subcategory.