Same-subcategory comparison

Invicti PlatformvsSnyk AI Security Platform

Compare buyer fit, pricing, capability depth, and purchase constraints within one buying category. A higher score is not a universal winner.

Comparison summary

How to choose

These conclusions apply to this subcategory and the buyer conditions shown here. They do not make one product universally better.

Invicti Platform

Consider when

Enterprise AppSec teams prioritizing proof-based DAST and API security
Programs consolidating code, dependency, container, IaC, secrets, and runtime findings

Check before choosing

Buyers requiring published numeric pricing or a permanent free plan
Small teams seeking the separate Acunetix product rather than an enterprise AppSec platform

Full profile

Snyk AI Security Platform

Consider when

Developer-led AppSec programs standardizing security checks in IDE, repository, pull-request and CI/CD workflows
Organizations consolidating SAST, SCA, container and IaC testing under one plan level while retaining module selection

Check before choosing

Buyers requiring one fully public all-module price with a published commitment and renewal schedule
Teams assuming DAST, API testing, secrets, IAST, Evo, human validation or runtime protection are in every Snyk platform plan

Full profile

Dimension	Invicti Platform	Snyk AI Security Platform
Pricing and trial	Web + API Requires quote · custom quote AppSec Core Requires quote · custom quote AppSec Flex Requires quote · custom quote Web + API covers DAST-led web and API testing. AppSec Core adds code, supply-chain, and posture-management scope. AppSec Flex adds enterprise integrations, governance, and flexible deployment. Agentic Pentest, professional services, Premium Support, and Guided Success are not core plans. Invicti on AWS Marketplace: Invicti offers public and private AWS Marketplace procurement. The listing's public numeric dimensions are legacy Invicti Enterprise, Acunetix, support, or standalone ASPM entries rather than current Web + API, AppSec Core, or AppSec Flex offers, so none are repeated here. Full profile	Free $0 USD · per contributing developer · per month · Individual developers and small teams Team $25 USD · per contributing developer · per month · starting at · Development teams purchasing one or more Snyk products at the Team plan level Ignite $1260 USD · per contributing developer · per year · starting at · Organizations with fewer than 50 developers Enterprise Requires quote · custom quote · Organizations purchasing selected Snyk products and Enterprise capabilities through Snyk sales Free is a permanent zero-cost entry with SAST, SCA, IaC and Container access subject to separate product test limits. Team and Ignite are public starting prices, not complete multi-module totals. Enterprise requires a quote. Payment timing, minimum commitment, renewal price, taxes, module quantities, overages and implementation costs are not publicly bound to the retained direct offers. DAST/API testing, Evo, premium success services and professional services are excluded from the platform starting price. Direct Snyk subscription: Free self-service signup, Team checkout, or sales-assisted Ignite and Enterprise purchase from the current Snyk plan ladder. Snyk Developer Security Platform on AWS Marketplace: A distinct AWS Marketplace SaaS route for the free Snyk Developer Security Platform listing; it does not establish paid module, Ignite, Enterprise or add-on pricing. Snyk API & Web: Separate Free and Enterprise product ladder for DAST, API discovery, web application scanning and API security testing. Evo by Snyk: Separate AI-security platform layer for agentic development security, AI security posture management and continuous offensive security; no inclusion in the retained platform prices is assumed. Full profile
Best for	Enterprise AppSec teams prioritizing proof-based DAST and API security Programs consolidating code, dependency, container, IaC, secrets, and runtime findings DevSecOps organizations needing CI/CD orchestration and two-way remediation workflows	Developer-led AppSec programs standardizing security checks in IDE, repository, pull-request and CI/CD workflows Organizations consolidating SAST, SCA, container and IaC testing under one plan level while retaining module selection Teams that value reachability, exploitability and application context for prioritization
Not for	Buyers requiring published numeric pricing or a permanent free plan Small teams seeking the separate Acunetix product rather than an enterprise AppSec platform Buyers unwilling to validate plan-specific IAST, target, deployment, support, and service scope through sales	Buyers requiring one fully public all-module price with a published commitment and renewal schedule Teams assuming DAST, API testing, secrets, IAST, Evo, human validation or runtime protection are in every Snyk platform plan Organizations that require a completely self-hosted Snyk scanning backend rather than SaaS, Broker or contracted Private Cloud
Source check	98/100	98/100
Key features	Proof-based DAST with runtime validation Multilayer API discovery and stateful API security testing Partner-supplied SAST with DAST and IAST runtime correlation Static and dynamic SCA, container security, IaC scanning, secrets detection, and SBOM with VEX ASPM, vulnerability management, deduplication, prioritization, and compliance reporting	Snyk Code build-free SAST across IDEs, pull requests, repositories and CI/CD Snyk Open Source SCA with transitive dependency analysis, license analysis and SBOM workflows Snyk Container scanning with base-image recommendations and Kubernetes context Snyk IaC scanning for Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, Helm and ARM templates Risk and priority scoring using reachability, exploit maturity, EPSS or CVSS and application context
Cons	No public numeric core-plan price, minimum, contract commitment, payment timing, renewal term, or implementation amount IAST is documented at platform level but not mapped to a current named plan SAST is partner-supplied, so engine coverage and entitlement should be confirmed	Team and Ignite amounts are starting prices total cost varies by selected products and contributing developers All purchased Snyk products must use the same plan level, which can make one module's higher-tier requirement an account-wide packaging decision
Category buying score	81	83Higher category-fit score
Rank	#3	#1
Context	Security & Privacy / Application Security Testing Software	Security & Privacy / Application Security Testing Software
Accuracy and validation	88Reduces false positives using proof-based dynamic testing and correlating runtime behaviors with static code findings.	79The facts support reachability, exploit maturity, EPSS or CVSS, and application-context prioritization, but they do not confirm manual validation or every language-specific analysis detail, so accuracy support is meaningful but bounded.
Testing scope and depth	86Spans web, API, code, and infrastructure artifacts, though IAST plan availability is unconfirmed and SAST requires a third-party partner engine.	86Provides comprehensive scanning depth for open-source dependencies, base images, infrastructure-as-code files, and application code, though DAST is a separate product.
Developer workflow	81Pipeline orchestration and two-way remediation into issue trackers can keep developers inside existing tools, provided SSO, CI/CD connectors, and tracker links are implemented for each team.	90The AST workflows extend across IDE, pull request, repository, CLI, and CI/CD, which gives strong developer-side touchpoints for scanning and review without requiring a separate security-only process.
Remediation quality	80Two-way remediation workflows, issue tracking, and runtime prioritization support practical follow-through on findings. The score is moderated because the exact remediation workflow depth and any bundled services must be confirmed in the quoted edition.	86Automated dependency pull requests, inline remediation, and eligible Snyk Agent Fix workflows provide concrete remediation support, but the facts do not promise the same fix depth for every stack or issue type.
Risk prioritization	84Runtime prioritization, ASPM correlation, and vulnerability management supply risk context across findings, while Flex can add CSPM, infrastructure VM, and bug-bounty sources when those systems are connected.	87Reachability, exploit maturity, EPSS or CVSS, and application context give the product clear risk-ranking inputs, which helps buyers prioritize the issues most relevant to their software and exposure.
Governance and integrations	78AppSec Flex adds CSPM, infrastructure vulnerability-management, and bug-bounty integrations, which can extend governance input into AST operations. The score stays below the top range because those integrations require compatible external systems and are not part of the base core scope.	81Enterprise Broker, regional hosting, API automation, and RBAC support governance and operational integration needs, but the facts require order-level confirmation for some enterprise capabilities and do not establish all integration boundaries.
Support and total cost	58All current plans require a quote, and the supplied facts do not state public prices, commitments, minimums, or payment timing, which makes support and total cost hard to model upfront. Premium Support, Guided Success, and professional services are not established as core-plan inclusions, so buyers need a sales check to compare full ownership cost.	63The pricing model uses per-contributing-developer tiers with product-specific pricing, all purchased products must share the same plan, and public amounts are starting prices rather than complete totals, which makes total cost and support packaging less predictable.
Full profile	Full profile	Full profile

Comparison summary

Most material score differences

These are the stored dimension rationales returned with each score. They explain the buyer conditions behind the gap without speculating about hidden model reasoning.

Accuracy and validation

9 pts

Invicti Platform · 88/100: Reduces false positives using proof-based dynamic testing and correlating runtime behaviors with static code findings.
Snyk AI Security Platform · 79/100: The facts support reachability, exploit maturity, EPSS or CVSS, and application-context prioritization, but they do not confirm manual validation or every language-specific analysis detail, so accuracy support is meaningful but bounded.

Developer workflow

9 pts

Invicti Platform · 81/100: Pipeline orchestration and two-way remediation into issue trackers can keep developers inside existing tools, provided SSO, CI/CD connectors, and tracker links are implemented for each team.
Snyk AI Security Platform · 90/100: The AST workflows extend across IDE, pull request, repository, CLI, and CI/CD, which gives strong developer-side touchpoints for scanning and review without requiring a separate security-only process.

Remediation quality

6 pts

Invicti Platform · 80/100: Two-way remediation workflows, issue tracking, and runtime prioritization support practical follow-through on findings. The score is moderated because the exact remediation workflow depth and any bundled services must be confirmed in the quoted edition.
Snyk AI Security Platform · 86/100: Automated dependency pull requests, inline remediation, and eligible Snyk Agent Fix workflows provide concrete remediation support, but the facts do not promise the same fix depth for every stack or issue type.

Research basis

This page uses stored product facts, official evidence, and category scoring rationales. It is not an account-based hands-on test, and third-party user ratings are not folded into the category buying score.

Invicti Platform: Fact confidence: 98% · Fact checked: 2026-08-10
Snyk AI Security Platform: Fact confidence: 98% · Fact checked: 2026-08-12

More tools

Application Security Testing Software

Add more tools from the same subcategory to this comparison. The page keeps up to 6 tools.

Snyk AI Security Platform

Snyk AI Security Platform combines Snyk Code SAST, Snyk Open Source SCA, Snyk Container, and Snyk IaC with IDE, repository, pull-request, CLI, CI/CD, prioritization, remediation, reporting, and enterprise governance workflows.

83Compared

HCL AppScan

HCL AppScan is an application security testing family spanning hosted and self-managed SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, API, secrets, container, and infrastructure-as-code testing with developer workflows, centralized risk management, and remediation guidance.

Invicti Platform

Invicti Platform is a DAST-first application security testing and posture management platform that combines web and API testing, proof-based runtime validation, SAST, SCA, container and infrastructure-as-code scanning, secrets detection, ASPM, and developer workflow automation.

81Compared

Mend AppSec

Mend AppSec is Mend.io's application security platform for SAST, SCA, container-image scanning, AI-assisted code security, dependency updates, risk prioritization, policy enforcement, and reporting across developer workflows.

OpenText Fortify Application Security Testing

OpenText Fortify Application Security Testing is a modular enterprise AppSec portfolio and governance platform spanning static, dynamic, open-source, API, mobile, and managed testing workflows.

Semgrep AppSec Platform

Semgrep AppSec Platform unifies Semgrep Code SAST, Semgrep Supply Chain SCA, and Semgrep Secrets with Pro Engine analysis, AI-assisted triage and remediation, policy controls, developer integrations, reporting, and managed or customer-run scanning.

Veracode Application Risk Management Platform

Veracode is a modular cloud-native application risk management platform with separately licensed SAST, DAST, SCA, and container/IaC capabilities, plus platform governance, developer integrations, optional AI remediation, and separately scoped expert services.

Black Duck Polaris Platform

Black Duck Polaris Platform is a cloud-native SaaS application security platform that combines Polaris fAST Static, fAST SCA, and fAST Dynamic with IaC analysis, secrets detection, DevOps integrations, centralized policy, risk scoring, dashboards, and reporting.

GitHub Advanced Security

GitHub Advanced Security is GitHub's application-security product family. Its current standalone offers are GitHub Secret Protection for secret detection and prevention, and GitHub Code Security for CodeQL scanning, premium dependency security, Copilot Autofix, and organization-level security workflows.

#10

Checkmarx One

Checkmarx One is an enterprise application security platform that combines configurable SAST, SCA, API security, DAST, IaC, container, supply-chain, runtime, ASPM, and AI-assisted remediation capabilities in shared developer and governance workflows.

More comparisons