Scoring method
How the score is calculated
The score uses the category-specific buying dimensions below and their displayed weights.
This page is based on public product information, official sources, structured feature data, and multi-model AI evaluation. It is not a hands-on lab test unless explicitly stated. Confidence percentages describe our research indicators, not the probability that a claim is true or a measured accuracy rate.
Cloud coverage and visibility18%
82Dynamic inventory, graph search, and multicloud agentless connections give buyers a searchable view of cloud and Kubernetes posture assets once the required trust relationships and components are configured.
Detection and policy depth18%
84Enables custom security policies and custom risk queries via OPA, giving security administrators control over configuration rules.
Risk prioritization and context16%
79Includes basic configuration-based CIEM findings with CSPM, while advanced usage-based identity insights require additional log ingestion.
Remediation operations15%
75Facilitates Git-based remediation workflows, but lacks broad multi-resource bulk auto-remediation capabilities without human merge steps.
Compliance and governance13%
84Maintains robust governance via scheduled compliance reports, custom exceptions, and structured policy zones.
Integrations and reporting10%
77Scheduled reports and CSPM APIs give reporting and integration hooks, and the supported buyer fit also names Git, Jira, SIEM, and notification workflows, but the facts do not establish continuous sync quality or a detailed integration catalog for every connector.
Support and total cost10%
52Total cost is driven by a quote-based CNAPP license on compute instances with no public numeric price, commitment, overage, or CSPM-only packaging, so buyers must clarify meters and add-ons such as data-volume DSPM before comparing ownership cost.