Same-subcategory comparison

BitSight External Attack Surface ManagementvsUpGuard Breach Risk

Compare buyer fit, pricing, capability depth, and purchase constraints within one buying category. A higher score is not a universal winner.

Comparison summary

How to choose

These conclusions apply to this subcategory and the buyer conditions shown here. They do not make one product universally better.

BitSight External Attack Surface Management

Consider when
  • Large and regulated enterprises with complex external infrastructure and subsidiaries
  • Security and risk teams that need curated attribution and evidence-backed ownership decisions
Check before choosing
  • Small teams requiring transparent self-service pricing and a lightweight scanner
  • Buyers requiring internal-network, endpoint, SIEM, EDR, or patch-deployment functionality
Full profile

UpGuard Breach Risk

Consider when
  • Small through enterprise teams that need continuously refreshed first-party external asset visibility
  • Organizations that want security ratings, external vulnerability findings, and remediation workflows in one product
Check before choosing
  • Teams buying internal authenticated vulnerability scanning, endpoint protection, or patch deployment
  • Buyers requiring exploit-based multi-hop attack-path validation or continuous adversary emulation
Full profile
DimensionBitSight External Attack Surface ManagementUpGuard Breach Risk
Pricing and trial
  • EASM Foundations
    • Requires quote · custom quote
  • EASM Enhanced
    • Requires quote · custom quote

BitSight provides a demo and tailored-quote route and identifies organization size and scope as quote factors. No amount, currency, unit price, included quantity, payment timing, commitment duration, minimum purchase, renewal condition, or general trial is publicly bound for the exact EASM purchase. No numeric Offer is generated.

  • BitSight EASM direct quote: Sales-assisted purchase of an EASM Foundations or EASM Enhanced subscription scoped to the organization and monitored footprint.
Full profile
  • Self-service
    • 250 · per subscription · per month · Breach Risk Self-service, 0 to 99 employees, monthly · billed monthly · month-to-month · minimum 1 subscription · Organization has 0 to 99 employees and purchases the current Breach Risk Self-service monthly state
    • 500 · per subscription · per month · Breach Risk Self-service, 100 to 999 employees, monthly · billed monthly · month-to-month · minimum 1 subscription · Organization has 100 to 999 employees and purchases the current Breach Risk Self-service monthly state
    • 2000 · per subscription · per month · Breach Risk Self-service, 1,000 to 9,999 employees, monthly · billed monthly · month-to-month · minimum 1 subscription · Organization has 1,000 to 9,999 employees and purchases the current Breach Risk Self-service monthly state
  • Standard
    • 19999 · per subscription · per year · Current Breach Risk Standard starting price · starting at · minimum 1 subscription · Current Breach Risk Standard premium plan; final scope and price above the published starting amount require sales confirmation
  • Enterprise
    • Requires quote · custom quote

The current help-center table binds three Self-service monthly prices to employee-count eligibility and publishes Standard from $19,999 per year. Currency is retained as not stated because the source names no currency. Enterprise, add-ons, bundles, and adjacent products are quote-based. Annual price presentation is not treated as proof of an annual commitment.

  • Breach Risk self-service subscription: Employee-banded Self-service subscription for organizations below 10,000 employees.
  • Breach Risk premium subscription: Sales-assisted Standard or Enterprise order with final scope, add-ons, and terms confirmed by UpGuard.
Full profile
Best for
  • Large and regulated enterprises with complex external infrastructure and subsidiaries
  • Security and risk teams that need curated attribution and evidence-backed ownership decisions
  • Programs combining outside-in vulnerability exposure with ratings, business context, and board reporting
  • Small through enterprise teams that need continuously refreshed first-party external asset visibility
  • Organizations that want security ratings, external vulnerability findings, and remediation workflows in one product
  • Lean teams that can use employee-banded Self-service and upgrade only when premium threat intelligence or API access is needed
Not for
  • Small teams requiring transparent self-service pricing and a lightweight scanner
  • Buyers requiring internal-network, endpoint, SIEM, EDR, or patch-deployment functionality
  • Teams expecting ASI threat intelligence, full TPRM, CTI, or managed services inside EASM
  • Teams buying internal authenticated vulnerability scanning, endpoint protection, or patch deployment
  • Buyers requiring exploit-based multi-hop attack-path validation or continuous adversary emulation
  • Organizations whose primary need is third-party Vendor Risk or Trust Exchange
Source check98/10098/100
Key features
  • Agentless external asset discovery through the Graph of Internet Assets
  • Human-curated and automated evidence-based entity attribution
  • Domains, IPs, CIDRs, services, products, certificates, cloud IPs, subsidiaries, and selected third-party assets
  • Continuous vulnerability, configuration, compromise, and infrastructure-change visibility
  • Possible, likely, and confirmed exposure and mitigation evidence
  • Continuous agentless external domain and IP discovery
  • Unlimited domain and IP inventory on all current paid plans
  • WHOIS, DNS, mail, certificate-transparency, redirect, reverse-DNS, and certificate-based attribution
  • Daily passive scans across ports, DNS, TLS, exposed products, and public configurations
  • Verified and version-inferred CVE findings with CVSS, EPSS, and CISA KEV context
Cons
  • No public amount, payment timing, minimum purchase, commitment, renewal term, or general exact-product trial was verified
  • Probable infrastructure, vulnerability evidence reports, and change reporting can require EASM Enhanced
  • Attribution and security-rating findings require governance for disputed, shared, parked, or third-party infrastructure
  • The current plan table uses dollar signs without naming currency
  • The broad features page retains an older $5,000-per-year statement that conflicts with the newer detailed Self-service and Standard plan states
  • Standard's per-year price period does not publicly establish annual commitment duration or payment timing
Category buying score
81Joint highest score
81Joint highest score
Rank#3#5
ContextSecurity & Privacy / Attack Surface Management (ASM) SoftwareSecurity & Privacy / Attack Surface Management (ASM) Software
Discovery and attribution accuracy
86Discovery accuracy is reinforced by combining automated evidence with human-curated entity attribution and buyer review controls, reducing false ownership while still requiring governance for disputed or shared infrastructure.
81Multiple attribution signals combined with distinction between verified and version-inferred CVE findings improve discovery usefulness, yet buyers must still review false positives and ownership before treating results as definitive.
Exposure visibility
85Buyers receive continuous views of vulnerabilities, configurations, compromises, and related mitigation evidence at possible, likely, and confirmed levels, supporting outside-in exposure tracking across the discovered asset set.
86Provides visibility through security ratings, risk profiles, executive reporting, and industry benchmarking data.
Risk prioritization
85Asset importance, finding severity, rating, and real-world impact are all part of the product, which supports risk ranking that can be aligned to business context and remediation order.
83CVSS, EPSS, CISA KEV context, security ratings, risk profiles, and industry benchmarking give teams concrete signals for ranking external findings, constrained by the absence of multi-hop attack-path exploitation proof.
Remediation operations
83Assignments, remediation statuses, risk acceptance, rescans, forecasts, and progress reporting support operational follow-through, but the facts do not show built-in patching or endpoint remediation execution.
81Facilitates internal resolution through structured tracking, waiver options, and on-demand scans of owned assets to confirm remediated findings.
Scale and data freshness
76Continuous scanning supports ongoing external visibility across complex corporate footprints, though specific refresh rates and search latency boundaries are not publicly stated.
86Unlimited domain and IP inventory on paid plans together with daily passive scans and continuous discovery keep external data fresh at scale, with Enterprise adding portfolios and subsidiary views for larger structures.
Integrations and reporting
84REST API access plus Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, Sentinel, XSOAR, Cortex, Sumo Logic, and Power BI connectors, together with executive and progress reporting, support embedding findings into existing security and leadership workflows.
72Standard and Enterprise add API access and integrations, and the product includes executive reports, but the lower plan boundary and unspecified integration breadth limit how far buyers can assume reporting and system connectivity go.
Support and total cost
56Total cost is driven by custom enterprise quotes based on organization size and monitored scope, with no verified public price, trial, or commitment term, and subsidiaries, integrations, support, or adjacent modules can further expand commercial outlay.
71Provides clear monthly rates for self-service employee bands, but the Standard edition starting at $19,999 per year is a significant cost step and lacks public commitment details.
Full profileFull profileFull profile

Comparison summary

Most material score differences

These are the stored dimension rationales returned with each score. They explain the buyer conditions behind the gap without speculating about hidden model reasoning.

Support and total cost

15 pts
BitSight External Attack Surface Management · 56/100
Total cost is driven by custom enterprise quotes based on organization size and monitored scope, with no verified public price, trial, or commitment term, and subsidiaries, integrations, support, or adjacent modules can further expand commercial outlay.
UpGuard Breach Risk · 71/100
Provides clear monthly rates for self-service employee bands, but the Standard edition starting at $19,999 per year is a significant cost step and lacks public commitment details.

Integrations and reporting

12 pts
BitSight External Attack Surface Management · 84/100
REST API access plus Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, Sentinel, XSOAR, Cortex, Sumo Logic, and Power BI connectors, together with executive and progress reporting, support embedding findings into existing security and leadership workflows.
UpGuard Breach Risk · 72/100
Standard and Enterprise add API access and integrations, and the product includes executive reports, but the lower plan boundary and unspecified integration breadth limit how far buyers can assume reporting and system connectivity go.

Scale and data freshness

10 pts
BitSight External Attack Surface Management · 76/100
Continuous scanning supports ongoing external visibility across complex corporate footprints, though specific refresh rates and search latency boundaries are not publicly stated.
UpGuard Breach Risk · 86/100
Unlimited domain and IP inventory on paid plans together with daily passive scans and continuous discovery keep external data fresh at scale, with Enterprise adding portfolios and subsidiary views for larger structures.

Research basis

Research basis

This page uses stored product facts, official evidence, and category scoring rationales. It is not an account-based hands-on test, and third-party user ratings are not folded into the category buying score.

BitSight External Attack Surface Management
Fact confidence: 98% · Fact checked: 2026-08-10
UpGuard Breach Risk
Fact confidence: 98% · Fact checked: 2026-08-10

More tools

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Software

Add more tools from the same subcategory to this comparison. The page keeps up to 6 tools.

#1

NetSPI Attack Surface Management

NetSPI Attack Surface Management is a current enterprise attack-surface solution combining External Attack Surface Management and Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management on the NetSPI Platform for external discovery and testing, internal asset intelligence, human validation, contextual risk prioritization, remediation workflows, and security-stack integrations.

83
#2

IONIX Attack Surface Management

IONIX Attack Surface Management is a SaaS platform for continuous external discovery, evidence-backed attribution, digital supply-chain mapping, active exposure validation, attack-path context, and routed remediation workflows.

82
#3

BitSight External Attack Surface Management

BitSight External Attack Surface Management is an agentless enterprise product for internet-asset discovery and attribution, external vulnerability and configuration visibility, risk prioritization, remediation tracking, integrations, and executive reporting.

81Compared
#4

Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse

Cortex Xpanse is a cloud-based external attack surface management platform whose Expander application continuously discovers and attributes internet-facing assets, monitors exposures, scores risk, and supports investigation and remediation workflows.

81
#5

UpGuard Breach Risk

UpGuard Breach Risk, formerly called BreachSight, is an agentless SaaS product for first-party external asset discovery, daily domain and IP monitoring, vulnerability and configuration findings, security ratings, remediation workflows, and plan-dependent threat intelligence and integrations.

81Compared
#6

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a cloud-delivered external attack surface management module that continuously maps internet-facing assets, attributes them to organizations and subsidiaries, prioritizes exposures with adversary and business context, and sends findings into remediation workflows.

80
#7

Outpost24 EASM

Outpost24 EASM is a currently purchasable cloud-native external attack surface management product for agentless discovery of domains, IPs, cloud infrastructure, shadow IT, services, certificates, vulnerabilities, and configuration risks, with continuous change monitoring, risk scoring, remediation tracking, reporting, integrations, and optional separately priced threat-intelligence modules.

79
#8

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management is an Azure-hosted EASM product that recursively discovers internet-facing assets, maintains current and historical inventory, and surfaces vulnerability, compliance, certificate, port, and reputation observations.

75
#9

Rapid7 Surface Command

Rapid7 Surface Command is a cloud attack-surface platform that combines seed-driven external discovery with connector-based internal asset and identity data, correlation, an asset graph, exposure prioritization, remediation workflows, and automation.

75
#10

SecurityScorecard Attack Surface Intelligence

SecurityScorecard Attack Surface Intelligence is a SaaS search interface and API for querying SecurityScorecard's underlying threat-data lake across exposed IPs and ports, confirmed CVEs, attributed domains, cloud hosting, malware, leaked records, ransomware, malicious reputation, and threat actors.

69

More comparisons

More same-subcategory comparisons for BitSight External Attack Surface Management

Compare the first tool against top-ranked and nearby tools in the same subcategory.